The PROS and CONS ofImplantingInformation Chips in Humans Essay

The PROS and CONS ofImplantingInformation Chips in Humans - Essay ExampleDue to reason, some(prenominal) eras has come in healthcare practice to improve the medical checkup record system of tolerants to the highest logical point. As the debate rages on how medical record system can be improved, scientists begin been swift in incorporating technology into the whole system. With some affaire that started with the need to switch from paper records of patients to computer database software in keeping records of patients, we like a shot have proposals on implanting chips in people to keep their medical records. The finesse is known as the implantable medical ID. Stein (2004) explains that the device is a microchip that can be implanted under the skin to ground doctors instant access to a patients records. Already, the proposal to implement the implantable medical records has won government approval. For now, the best thing to do is to continue detain on the pros and cons of the dev ice and technology to come to a logical shutdown on whether or not the system would be helpful in the discharge of medical duties. Pros Already, at that place are health gurus who have approved of the use of the implantable medical ID and have started using them already. ... Therefore if at that place is the need to switch hospital at any point in time or belong inter-state, the records of the user will be ready as and when they are needed. The second point has to do with the gumshoe of the system. Clearly, papers get burn or soaked with water and computer software gets corrupted or crashed. Any of these situations temper with the safety of records. With the implantable medical ID however, the records remain intact as long as the patient is alive. Yet again, the implantable medical ID is very reliable in emergency situations. Indeed medical emergencies come unannounced and therefore make the need to going to get a persons records in propagation of medical emergencies very diff icult. With the implantable medical ID however, a patient does not have to worry about emergencies because the device caters for that. It is always available and reliable. These points are supported by Merrill (2009) who states that the implantable medical ID was designed to provide his identification and adjacent access to his medical history in the take downt of an emergency. Cons The beautiful advantages discussed above notwithstanding, the implantable medical ID come with a number of cons or disadvantages. There are commentators who argue as to whether or not the implantation and its removal themselves do not pose health risks and threats. There are many critics who are of the view that even though it is easier implanting the chip, removing it can be very complicated. John Halamka, MD, CIO at Harvard Medical School and CareGroup in Massachusetts, for event laments that its easy to insert but challenging to remove. I have no plan to have mine removed (Merrill, 2009). The seco nd demerit has to do with the cost involved in